Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/04/2000 09:13 AM Senate FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 40 Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska providing that the governor, United States senators, United States representative, and electors of the President and Vice-President of the United States be elected by a majority vote. This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance Committee. Co-Chair Torgerson drew the Committee's attention to a legal opinion prepared by the Division of Legal and Research Services as requested by Senator Adams regarding whether this resolution was considered a constitutional amendment or a revision. [Copy on File.] Co-Chair Torgerson noted that the opinion stated in part, ".the three resolutions considered by the court under this test in the Bess vs. Ulmer case, SJR 40 appears closer in terms of the quantity and quality of change proposed to the two resolutions held to be amendments (marriage and reapportionment) than the resolution held to be a revision (rights of prisoners)." Co-Chair Torgerson qualified that the opinion also stated that the division was unsure how the court would actually rule if the matter were litigated. SENATOR ROBIN TAYLOR responded to three questions posed in the previous hearing from a representative from the Department of Law. The first question related to the definition of "majority" where the recommendation was made to include a definition in the constitution itself. Senator Taylor stated that he had no objection to Senator Adams's proposed amendment that would add that definition. Senator Taylor responded to the Department of Law's second inquiry about the Electoral College and its membership. He stated that so long as the Electoral College was still in existence, he felt that the provisions providing for this system should be left in the legislation. His reason was that there could be as many as nine presidential candidates running for US President within the State Of Alaska and without a majority requirement, the subsequent delegates to the Electoral College would represent only a small minority of voters. Senator Taylor then addressed the question of run-off elections saying he did not wish to make a decision on the procedures of such elections at this time. Senator Taylor spoke to another proposed amendment that changes "procedures" to the singular "procedure". He did not think this change was necessary, saying that the corresponding statute is sufficient and that the Division of Elections would establish procedure. Amendment #1: This amendment inserts the following language on page 1, line 16, of the resolution, following, "elected." "The winning candidate must be the first choice of at least 50 percent plus one of the votes cast for the office." Senator Adams moved for adoption and explained that the amendment places the specific definition of majority into the constitution. AT EASE 9:23 AM / 9:25 Co-Chair Parnell moved to amend the amendment to delete "first" from the inserted language. The sentence then reads, "The winning candidate must be the choice of at least 50 percent plus one of the votes cast for the office." There was no objection and the amendment was AMENDED. Without objection, the amended amendment was ADOPTED. Amendment #2: This amendment deletes, "and elector of President and Vice-President of the United States," from page 1, lines 14 and 15 of the resolution. The title then reads, "Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State Of Alaska providing that the governor, United States senators, and United States representative, be elected by a majority vote." This amendment also deletes, "Procedures [THE PROCEDURE] for arriving at a majority vote, and for" and inserts, "The procedure for" on page 1 line 16 through page 2 line 1 of the resolution. The sentence then reads, "The procedure for determining election contests, with right of appeal to the courts, shall be prescribed by law." Co-Chair Parnell moved for adoption on behalf of Co-Chair Torgerson, the sponsor. Co-Chair Torgerson explained this is a two-part amendment that deletes the elections of the president and the vice- president from the majority requirement and also removes the procedures for arriving at the majority vote from the constitution. He asked the resolution sponsor's opinion on this amendment. Senator Taylor repeated his statement about the multiple candidates for president and vice-president on Alaska's recent ballots. Until the country changes and removes the Electoral College system of choosing presidents and vice- presidents, he still wanted the majority represented. Co-Chair Torgerson said he was unsure the voters would understand the relationship between the votes cast for these candidates and the representation on the Electoral College. Senator Leman asked how other states chose electors for president and vice-president. He commented that there have been some strong third-party candidates and the electorates resulting from these races don't represent a majority of the votes cast. Senator Taylor thought that there were several different methods of determining delegates amongst the states. CHIP WAGONER testified that other states were currently debating the same issue of majority votes and that Vermont is one state that is including electorates in the majority requirement. Mr. Wagoner described the electoral process and how the political parties select the delegates. He stated that under the US Constitution the states have the authority to structure the majority requirements as proposed in this resolution. He stated that elections would not be delayed because of the majority requirements because the voters don't select the electorates. Co-Chair Torgerson asked if under current practice, the political parties hold an election to chose its delegates. Mr. Wagoner affirmed told about how the Republican Party chooses the electorates. He listed several Republicans who have served as delegates and were chosen based on their contribution to the party. He noted that in Alaska, the party of the presidential candidate who receives the most votes chooses all the electorates for the next presidential election. Co-Chair Torgerson asked if these elections were public. Mr. Wagoner explained how the elections occur during the Republican Party Convention. He was unsure how the Democratic Party held its elections, noting that the last time the delegates were chosen by the Democrats was in 1960, after John F. Kennedy received the majority of the votes cast in Alaska. Co-Chair Torgerson did not understand the problem that needed to be addressed with an amendment to the state constitution. Mr. Wagoner reiterated that there were multiple presidential candidates in the past several elections and that none of these candidates received a majority of the votes. He asserted that "majority rule is a sacred principal of democracy" as stated by Thomas Jefferson. With the multitude of parties entering the presidential race, Mr. Wagoner stressed, this constitutional amendment ensures that the majority rules. Senator Adams asked the witness for his legal opinion on the revision versus amendment question. He did not want to rule out the possibility that the court would reach the conclusion that this resolution is a revision and therefore not eligible to be placed before the voters. Senator Adams spoke of the short time period between Election Day and the day the governor takes office, questioning whether there would be time to conduct a runoff election. Mr. Wagoner spoke to the legal opinion request, agreeing that the resolution would be an amendment to the constitution. He disagreed with the Supreme Court ruling. Senator Adams commented that he disagreed with the opinions. GAIL FENUMANI, Division of Elections, Office of the Governor asked if the amendment was proposed for both the primary and the general election or just the general election. Ms. Fenumani pointed out that there would be a timing problem with holding a runoff election. She detailed the process of certifying an election and the amount of time required. Ms. Fenumani then addressed the cost of holding a runoff election noting that the cost of a runoff election would be approximately $750,000 based on the expenditures for the September 14, 1999 special election. Ms. Fenumani asked if a presidential candidate did not win in Alaska by a 50 percent plus one vote majority, would a runoff election between the top two candidates be required. Ms. Fenumani commented that the presidential elections are mostly decided by the time the polls close in this state. Senator Phillips remarked that if this constitutional election passes then the legislature could address those questions in the next session. He stressed these details could not be placed in the amendment. He used the 1976 constitutional amendment to establish the Alaska Permanent Fund as an example of how the details of the board of directors, dividends, etc. were not addressed until after the election. Ms. Fenumani responded that she just wanted to state these issues on the record. She stressed that the division had not taken a position in support or in opposition of the resolution. Co-Chair Torgerson asked if the witness interpreted there would be a need for a runoff election for the president and vice-president offices. He thought that was a "far stretch". Senator P. Kelly disagreed, saying that the way the amendment was written, the matter was somewhat confusing. Ms. Fenumani noted that if the language is intended for the method of how electorates are chosen within party, the question of runoff elections for president and vice- president was answered. KATHLEEN STRASBAUGH, Assistant Attorney General, Governmental Affairs Section, Civil Division, Department of Law, added that this constitutional amendment may apply to primary as well as general elections. Ms. Strasbaugh had concerns with mentioning the Electoral College in the state constitution when elsewhere, only the offices of president and vice-president are specifically referred to. She noted that the legislature currently dictates how the electorates are selected in AS 15.30. She saw no reason to change this procedure. She did however, understand the principles that the resolution's sponsor was trying to accomplish would limit the legislature's ability regarding runoff elections. She warned that conducting a runoff election for the office of governor would be difficult because of another state constitutional provision that provides when elected officials takes office. She said the problem continues because US Congress has determined, in federal statutes, that the electorates must be seated by a specific deadline as well. She ascertained that these were fairly serious matters that could not be avoided. Co-Chair Parnell commented on the term of office of the governor citing Article 3 Section 4 of the state constitution, "the term of office of the governor's four years beginning at noon on the first Monday in December following his election, ending at noon on the first Monday of December four years later." He pointed out however, that this provision only addresses the term office but does not specify when the elected governor must be seated. He remarked that under existing procedure, the general election is not certified until December 13, although the term of office still begins on the first Monday of the month, which is an earlier date. Therefore, he surmised that a runoff election would require no term changes even if the elected official were not seated until a later date. Ms. Strasbaugh referred to litigation in other states where a problem has been identified concerning whether the state constitution must be followed precisely. She was concerned that Co-Chair Parnell's scenario may not be that easy. She stressed that any changes to the election process must be pre-cleared by the US Department of Justice. Senator Leman took issue with the previous witness's comment that presidential elections were decided before Alaska's voting was completed. He clarified that while the polls in this state closed later than in other states, all other states still have to count absentee ballots and certify their elections as well. Ms. Fenumani corrected her statement to apply to the projected outcomes only. Senator Taylor thought that with the new computerized systems, elections are conducted much faster. He did not think the time it would take to conduct a runoff election would be a hardship. Senator Leman asked if the sponsor's intent was to include primary elections in the majority vote requirements. Senator Taylor answered he only wanted this to apply to the general election saying he thought the language of the resolution made that clear. He explained that the primary election does not directly elect a candidate to office. Senator Leman agreed with that analysis but noted that sometimes others read ballot initiatives differently and wondered if the question should be cleared up now rather than have difficulties in the future. Senator Taylor did not think specific clarification was necessary referring to page one, line eight of the resolution that specifically states, "general election" with no mention of the primary election. Senator Phillips commented that of all concerns the Division of Elections pointed out, the only legitimate one he felt was the matter of timing. He suggested this issue should be addressed. He spoke of the 14 days needed to receive overseas absentee ballots and of other delays. While he agreed that the automatic voting tabulation system, AccuVote, made in-person ballot counting easier, absentee ballots were a different matter. Senator Taylor responded that in some close elections there could be a recount, a second recount and even litigation. Therefore, he thought runoff elections could be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. Senator P. Kelly was unsure that the word "general" on page one, line eight addressed the entire issue of whether primary elections would be subject to the majority restrictions. He pointed out that this section, Section 3. Election, only refers to the governor and not to the congressional and presidential candidates. Although he agreed with the sponsor's interpretation that this constitutional amendment should only apply to general elections, he was concerned how others, including the courts, would interpret the language. Senator Leman objected to the adoption of Amendment #2 A roll call was taken on the motion. IN FAVOR: Senator Wilken, Senator P. Kelly, Senator Phillips, Co-Chair Parnell and Co-Chair Torgerson OPPOSED: Senator Green, Senator Leman and Senator Adams ABSENT: Senator Donley The motion PASSED (5-3-1) Senator Phillips asked for legal opinion on the impact a runoff election would have on the timing of swearing-in of the governor. Co-Chair Torgerson said he would request a legal opinion and that it could be prepared in time for the resolution to reach the full Senate. Co-Chair Parnell offered a motion to report SJR 40, 1- LS1579\A, as amended from Committee with a $1,500 fiscal note from the Division of Elections. There was no objection and the resolution MOVED FROM COMMITTEE.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|